ETH Funding Rate Deep Dive May 13: -83% STABLE & Cross-DEX Arbitrage

The crypto derivatives market enters May 13 with a distinctly risk-off complexion. Total market capitalisation sits at $2.77 trillion, down 1.5% over the past 24 hours, while Bitcoin dominance has climbed to 58.3% — a level that historically correlates with capital rotating out of altcoins and into the incumbent. For ETH perpetual futures, this environment translates into funding rates that hover near the zero line across most major venues, reflecting a market divided between cautious longs and assertive shorts. On Binance, ETH-USDT perps are printing a marginal positive funding rate of approximately 0.005% per eight hours, barely above break-even and well below the 0.01% baseline that signals genuine bullish conviction. Bybit mirrors this lethargy with its ETH-USDC contract showing 0.003% per eight hours, while OKX registers a barely perceptible 0.002%. These readings collectively paint a picture of a market that is neither aggressively leaning long nor capitulating short — it is simply waiting. The significance of flat ETH funding cannot be overstated for crypto derivatives strategists. When the benchmark asset's funding rate compresses toward zero, it often precedes a volatility expansion. The reasoning is straightforward: funding rates are a proxy for leverage skew. When leverage is balanced, the market lacks a dominant directional conviction, and the ensuing breakout — whenever it arrives — tends to be violent because one side of the trade will be forced to cover en masse. On Hyperliquid, where on-chain perp markets tend to price risk with greater immediacy than their centralised counterparts, ETH funding has dipped slightly negative at -0.001% per eight hours. This modest short bias on the premier perp DEX hints that decentralised venue participants are positioning more defensively than the broader market.

Hyperliquid Rate Extremes: STABLE at -82.92% Annualised

While ETH funding rates sit in tranquil territory, Hyperliquid's altcoin perp markets are anything but calm. The standout data point for May 13 is STABLE, which carries a staggering funding rate of -0.0757% per eight hours — annualised to -82.92%. At a mark price of just $0.04, this represents an extreme short squeeze dynamic in reverse: shorts are paying longs an annualised yield approaching 83% simply to maintain their positions. The mechanics behind such an extreme negative rate are worth unpacking. STABLE's 12.6% price surge in the past 24 hours — making it the top gainer across the market — has likely triggered a wave of short liquidations and forced re-hedging. When a low-cap asset moves violently upward, shorts who were caught offside must either close their positions by buying back into strength or continue paying the funding rate premium to stay in the trade. The negative funding is the market's equilibrium mechanism: it incentivises new longs to enter by collecting the funding payment and disincentivises additional shorting until the imbalance resolves. For ETH traders, STABLE's extreme serves as a reminder that altcoin perp funding can diverge wildly from the benchmark. The -82.92% annualised rate is an outlier, but it is precisely the kind of outlier that funding rate arbitrageurs hunt. A trader who buys STABLE spot or holds a delta-neutral long perp position collects a phenomenally high yield — but the risk of a violent reversal is equally extreme. STABLE's mark price of $0.04 means thin liquidity and wide spreads, making execution risk a genuine concern. Contrast this with kLUNC at -0.0152% per eight hours (-16.61% annualised) and SAGA at -0.0141% per eight hours (-15.47% annualised). These are far more manageable negative rates that still offer meaningful carry income without the tail risk of a micro-cap implosion. The lesson for perp DEX participants is clear: extreme funding rates signal opportunity, but the magnitude of the rate often correlates with the magnitude of the underlying risk.

Cross-Exchange ETH Funding Rate Comparison

One of the most actionable dimensions of perpetual futures analysis is the comparison of funding rates across exchanges. ETH, as the second-most-traded perp asset globally, offers particularly rich arbitrage surfaces when rates diverge between venues. On May 13, these divergences are subtle but present — and in a flat-rate environment, even a few basis points of difference can compound meaningfully over time. Starting with the centralised exchanges: Binance ETH-USDT perps are printing approximately 0.005% per eight hours, which annualises to roughly 5.48%. Bybit's ETH-USDC contract comes in at 0.003% per eight hours (3.29% annualised), while OKX offers 0.002% per eight hours (2.19% annualised). Bitget and BingX both hover near the 0.004% mark. These are not dramatic differences in absolute terms, but for a fund running a systematic carry strategy on a nine-figure ETH position, the gap between Binance and OKX represents a 329-basis-point annualised difference in funding income. On the decentralised side, Hyperliquid's ETH perp shows -0.001% per eight hours (-1.10% annualised), while other perp DEXs like Vest and Bluefin cluster around 0.001% to 0.002% per eight hours. The negative rate on Hyperliquid is the most notable data point: it means that a trader going long ETH on Hyperliquid is actually being paid to hold the position, whereas the same long on Binance would be paying funding. This is a classic cross-venue arbitrage signal. The structural reasons for this divergence are well-documented. Perp DEXs tend to have a higher proportion of sophisticated, directionally agnostic traders who are quicker to deploy short hedges during uncertain markets. Centralised exchanges, by contrast, have a larger retail base that naturally leans long. When market sentiment shifts toward caution — as it has with today's 1.5% market cap decline — the DEX crowd shorts first, pushing funding negative while CEX funding remains slightly positive. Using Tangerine to compare these rates in real time eliminates the tedious manual process of checking each venue individually. The perp DEX aggregator surfaces the best funding rate for any given position direction, allowing traders to capture an extra 300-600 basis points annually simply by choosing the right venue — a decision that requires zero additional market risk.

Negative Funding Carry Trades: STABLE, kLUNC, SAGA

Negative funding rates create one of the most compelling structural trades in crypto derivatives: the carry trade. When a perpetual futures contract has a negative funding rate, longs are paid by shorts. A trader who establishes a delta-neutral long perp position — hedged with a spot short or an opposing perp short on another venue — collects the funding payment as pure carry income, largely insulated from directional price risk. Today's data presents a spectrum of negative funding opportunities. At the extreme end, STABLE's -0.0757% per eight hours (-82.92% annualised) is the headline grabber, but as discussed, the execution risk at a $0.04 mark price is substantial. More pragmatic carry targets include kLUNC at -0.0152% per eight hours (-16.61% annualised, mark $0.09) and SAGA at -0.0141% per eight hours (-15.47% annualised, mark $0.05). STBL at -0.0074% per eight hours (-8.09% annualised) and NOT at -0.0026% per eight hours (-2.86% annualised) offer more conservative carry with correspondingly lower risk profiles. SAGA deserves particular attention because it has been a persistent negative funding story. As covered in yesterday's SAGA -58% funding rate analysis, SAGA was printing -58% annualised just 24 hours ago. Today's rate has moderated to -15.47%, which could indicate that the short crowding is beginning to ease — or it could simply reflect a temporary equilibrium before the next leg of selling pressure. SAGA is also trending today, which often precedes volatility. The carry trade math for SAGA is straightforward: a delta-neutral long collecting -0.0141% per eight hours earns approximately 15.47% annualised. Over a 30-day period, that equates to roughly 1.29% in pure funding income, assuming the rate remains constant. The risk, of course, is that SAGA's spot price moves violently against the hedge, creating slippage and impermanent loss in the delta-neutral structure. For traders deploying carry strategies, the key is diversification across multiple negative-rate assets rather than concentrating in a single name. A basket approach — splitting capital across kLUNC, SAGA, and STBL — reduces idiosyncratic risk while maintaining an attractive blended carry yield in the 10-15% annualised range.

Long-Biased Funding: VINE, XMR, and TRUMP

On the opposite side of the funding spectrum, several assets are printing positive rates that signal strong long conviction — or, more accurately, long crowding. VINE leads with 0.0411% per eight hours (44.98% annualised), a rate that suggests aggressive leverage on the long side. XMR follows at 0.0136% per eight hours (14.84% annualised), TRUMP at 0.0107% per eight hours (11.68% annualised), KAS at 0.0096% per eight hours (10.46% annualised), and FARTCOIN at 0.0050% per eight hours (5.49% annualised). VINE's 44.98% annualised positive funding is a red flag for anyone considering a long position. Positive funding of this magnitude means longs are paying a steep premium to maintain their trades, and historically, such extreme positive rates have preceded corrective moves as the crowded long side unwinds. For contrarian traders, this is a short setup signal: if VINE's price momentum stalls, the funding payment provides a generous subsidy for holding the short position while waiting for the reversal. XMR's 14.84% annualised rate is more nuanced. Monero's privacy narrative has cyclically attracted speculative interest, and at a mark price of $412.28, the asset has significant notional depth. The positive funding likely reflects genuine demand rather than pure speculative crowding, making it a less compelling short-from-funding candidate than VINE. However, for ETH traders looking for relative value, XMR's positive funding could fund a pairs trade: short XMR perps, long ETH perps, collecting the funding differential. TRUMP's 11.68% annualised rate sits in the middle ground. Political meme tokens are inherently sentiment-driven, and TRUMP's positive funding suggests the market is positioned for further upside. But the mark price of $2.57 and the token's high volatility make this a high-risk funding trade. KAS at 10.46% annualised offers a more technically grounded positive rate, as the Kaspa ecosystem has seen genuine development activity supporting the long thesis. The actionable takeaway: in a market where ETH funding is flat, the positive-rate altcoins represent both a cost for longs and an opportunity for funding-aware shorts. Traders who systematically short the highest positive-rate assets while hedging delta have historically generated consistent alpha in crypto derivatives markets.

SAGA's Persistent Negative Rate: Two-Day Deep Dive

SAGA's presence in both yesterday's and today's funding rate data makes it a compelling case study in persistent negative funding dynamics. Yesterday, SAGA was the standout asset with a -58.72% annualised rate, as detailed in the May 12 funding rate arbitrage report. Today, the rate has compressed to -15.47% annualised — still significantly negative, but markedly less extreme. This compression tells a story. When a negative funding rate moves from -58% to -15% over 24 hours, it typically indicates one of two dynamics. The first possibility is that some shorts have covered, reducing the imbalance and bringing the rate closer to equilibrium. The second is that new longs have entered the market, attracted by the generous funding payment, which also serves to compress the rate. In SAGA's case, the fact that it is trending today — alongside FIRO, SUN, ZANO, BILL, PENGU, and WOJAK — suggests increased attention that could be drawing in new long-side participants seeking to harvest the carry. SAGA is also notable for appearing on multiple consecutive trending lists, a pattern that suggests sustained narrative momentum rather than a fleeting pump. For funding rate strategists, persistent negative rates on a trending asset create a rare sweet spot: the funding payment subsidises a long position while the trend provides directional tailwind. The risk, of course, is that the trend reverses and the negative funding simultaneously compresses further, eliminating both the carry income and the price appreciation potential. Cross-venue analysis adds another dimension. On Bybit, SAGA perps are showing a more moderate -0.008% per eight hours (-8.76% annualised), while Binance does not currently offer a SAGA perp market. This means the deepest liquidity for SAGA carry trades is on the DEX side, particularly Hyperliquid, where the rate remains more extreme at -0.0141%. Tangerine's aggregation reveals these inter-venue gaps instantly, allowing traders to deploy capital where the carry is richest rather than settling for the rate available on a single exchange. For the session ahead, SAGA remains one of the most interesting assets in perp funding markets. The combination of persistent negative rates, trending status, and inter-venue rate divergence makes it a prime candidate for both directional longs seeking carry subsidies and delta-neutral traders hunting for pure funding income.

ETH Perp Trading Setups for May 13

Bringing the analysis back to ETH itself, the current funding rate landscape suggests several actionable setups for May 13. The core thesis is straightforward: ETH funding is flat to slightly negative on DEXs, the broader market is risk-off, and BTC dominance is climbing — a confluence that historically favours defensive positioning with optional upside exposure. Setup one: the DEX long carry. Going long ETH on Hyperliquid at -0.001% per eight hours means being paid to hold a long position. If ETH rallies, the trader profits from both price appreciation and funding income. If ETH declines, the funding payment provides a small but real offset to the loss. This is a superior execution venue compared to Binance, where the same long position would cost 0.005% per eight hours. The annualised difference is approximately 6.6 percentage points — a meaningful edge that compounds over weeks and months. Setup two: the cross-venue funding arbitrage. Buy ETH perps on Hyperliquid, where the rate is -0.001% and you collect funding, and sell ETH perps on Binance, where the rate is +0.005% and you also collect funding from the short side. This creates a delta-neutral position that earns the funding spread: 0.001% plus 0.005% equals 0.006% per eight hours, or approximately 6.57% annualised, with zero directional exposure. The key risk is basis divergence between the two venues, but for ETH — a highly liquid asset — basis risk is minimal over short holding periods. Setup three: the ETH-XMR pairs trade. Short XMR perps, collecting 0.0136% per eight hours, and go long ETH perps on Hyperliquid, collecting 0.001% per eight hours. The combined funding income is 0.0146% per eight hours, or approximately 15.96% annualised, with the directional bet being that ETH outperforms XMR. Given XMR's positive funding and the current risk-off environment, this pairs trade offers a structural edge. Setup four: the broad negative-funding basket. Allocate across long perp positions in kLUNC, SAGA, and STBL, funded partially by short perp positions in VINE and TRUMP. The blended carry on the long side is approximately 13-17% annualised, while the short side generates roughly 28% annualised. Net carry depends on allocation weights, but a carefully constructed basket could yield 15-20% annualised with diversified exposure across the funding rate spectrum. These setups are not mutually exclusive. A well-capitalised derivatives portfolio can run multiple strategies simultaneously, hedging overall market exposure while harvesting funding rate alpha across venues and assets.

Navigating Rate Fragmentation with Tangerine

The perpetual futures market in 2026 is characterised by unprecedented fragmentation. With over a dozen active perp DEXs — Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, Vest, Bluefin, Paradex, EdgeX, WOOFi Pro, Hibachi, Pacifica, and more — alongside the CEX stalwarts of Binance, Bybit, OKX, BingX, Bitget, and KuCoin, the sheer number of venues makes manual rate comparison impractical. This fragmentation is both a challenge and an opportunity: a challenge because the best rate is scattered across platforms, and an opportunity because the rate spreads themselves are the source of alpha. Today's data illustrates this vividly. ETH funding on Hyperliquid is -0.001% per eight hours, on Binance it is +0.005%, and on Bybit it is +0.003%. SAGA's rate on Hyperliquid is -0.0141% per eight hours while Bybit shows -0.008%. STABLE's -0.0757% rate may or may not be replicated on other venues — and that uncertainty alone is a reason to check. Each of these differences represents a quantifiable edge for the trader who can identify and act on them quickly. Tangerine solves the fragmentation problem by aggregating funding rates across all major perp DEXs and CEXs in a single interface. For the funding rate arbitrageur, this means instant visibility into the best available rate for any position direction and any asset. For the carry trader, it means identifying the richest negative-rate long opportunity and the most expensive positive-rate short opportunity without switching between ten browser tabs. For the directional trader, it means minimising the funding cost of a conviction trade by executing on the venue where the rate is most favourable. The Web3 derivatives landscape is evolving toward greater efficiency, but we are still in a transitional phase where rate discrepancies between venues are large enough to generate meaningful outperformance for informed traders. As yesterday's ETH funding rate deep-dive demonstrated, these discrepancies are persistent — they do not resolve within a single session. The trader who makes rate comparison a core part of their process, rather than an afterthought, compounds a structural edge over time. For May 13, the key actionable insight is this: in a flat ETH funding environment, the alpha lies in the altcoin extremes and the cross-venue spreads. STABLE's -82.92% annualised rate, SAGA's persistent -15.47%, VINE's crowded 44.98%, and the 600-basis-point ETH spread between Hyperliquid and Binance are not data points to observe — they are trades to execute. And Tangerine is the tool that makes that execution possible.

Related articles