Tangerine logo

ETH Perp Funding Deep Dive: MAVIA 58% & BLAST -46% Shorts | Apr 24

Explore the April 24 ETH perp funding rates with MAVIA at 58% annualised and BLAST shorts paying 46%. Discover funding rate arbitrage and carry trade setups.

·10 min read
ETH Perp Funding Deep Dive: MAVIA 58% & BLAST -46% Shorts | Apr 24

Market Overview & Macro Backdrop

The total crypto market cap currently sits at $2.69 trillion, reflecting a 1.1% decrease over the last 24 hours, while Bitcoin dominance holds firm at 58.1%. This risk-off environment is creating highly polarized conditions in the ETH perpetual futures market. As capital rotates out of speculative assets and back into BTC, altcoin perps are experiencing extreme funding rate divergences. Traders leveraging Web3 infrastructure and crypto derivatives are actively seeking yield, turning the funding rate market into a prime hunting ground for carry trades. Today’s trending tokens—CHIP, SPK, PENGU, AAVE, BTC, TAO, and ASTEROID—show where the narrative interest lies, but the real alpha is in the funding rates. While ZEC posts a respectable 5.6% gain and STABLE surges 17.4%, the underlying perp mechanics tell a deeper story of liquidation risks and arbitrage opportunities. For traders navigating this volatility, comparing rates across a perp DEX aggregator like Tangerine is essential to capture the highest yield or pay the lowest cost, ensuring strategies are optimized whether executing on Hyperliquid, Aster, or centralized venues like Binance and Bybit. The ETH perpetual ecosystem is currently offering a buffet of extreme rates, and understanding the mechanics behind these numbers is the key to unlocking non-directional profits in a choppy market. We are observing heavy segmentation between decentralized and centralized order books, leading to significant pricing inefficiencies that agile traders can exploit.

MAVIA: The 58% Annualised Long Squeeze

MAVIA continues to dominate the funding rate leaderboards, though the heat is slightly cooling from yesterday's extremes. Today, MAVIA carries a funding rate of 0.0533% per 8 hours on Hyperliquid, translating to a staggering 58.41% annualised yield. With the mark price hovering at a mere $0.03, the cost of capital for longs is astronomically high relative to the underlying asset value. This premium suggests that a subset of traders is desperately holding long positions, likely trapped from higher entries and refusing to realize losses, or attempting to squeeze a supply-constrained market. However, this is a sharp pullback from the 135% annualised rates observed just yesterday. As we noted in our MAVIA 135% Funding Rate analysis, such extreme premiums are rarely sustainable and often precede violent reversals. For those looking at funding rate arbitrage, shorting MAVIA perps while holding the spot asset (if available and liquid) presents an enticing carry trade, assuming one can manage the acute liquidation risks associated with low-cap, high-volatility assets. Comparing venues, MAVIA's rate on Hyperliquid is significantly higher than what is currently offered on Bybit or BingX, where the annualised yield sits closer to 32%. This cross-exchange divergence is exactly where a perp DEX aggregator adds value, allowing traders to pinpoint the most lucrative venue to collect funding without sacrificing execution quality.

BLAST & REZ: Heavy Short Premiums

On the flip side of the market, heavily shorted assets are offering substantial yields for brave longs. BLAST is currently printing a negative funding rate of -0.0420% per 8 hours, or -46.0% annualised, with a mark price effectively at $0.00. This means shorts are paying nearly half their position value annually just to maintain their bearish bets. Similarly, REZ is registering at -0.0337% per 8 hours (-36.93% annualised), also with a mark price at $0.00. These extreme negative rates indicate overwhelming bearish conviction, but they also signal a market that is incredibly crowded on the short side. When an asset's mark price is grinding near zero and the funding rate is deeply negative, the risk of a short squeeze escalates dramatically. Any unexpected catalyst—such as an exchange listing, protocol update, or broader market rally—could force these shorts to cover simultaneously, driving the price up violently. For crypto derivatives traders, this environment is ripe for a carry trade: going long on the perp to collect the 46% annualised funding on BLAST, while hedging exposure via spot or another perp on a CEX like Binance or OKX where the negative rate might be less severe. By utilizing Tangerine to compare funding rates across DEXs like Bluefin or Vest against CEXs, traders can construct delta-neutral positions that harvest these massive short premiums while mitigating directional risk.

AZTEC & STABLE: Diverging Sentiments

Privacy and stability-focused assets are showing distinct divergences in their perp market structures today. AZTEC, the privacy-centric protocol, is seeing its shorts pay a hefty premium at -0.0327% per 8 hours (-35.82% annualised), with a mark price of $0.02. The deep negative rate suggests traders are aggressively shorting the asset, perhaps anticipating further unlocks or dilution, or simply de-risking from privacy narratives in the current regulatory climate. Conversely, STABLE is presenting a fascinating dynamic: it is one of the top 24h gainers with a +17.4% spot surge, yet its funding rate remains deeply negative at -0.0273% per 8 hours (-29.87% annualised), with a mark price of $0.03. This divergence—where spot is pumping while perps remain heavily shorted—is a classic short squeeze setup. Shorts are being liquidated on the spot rally, but the persisting negative funding implies that a significant portion of the market is still betting on a reversal, doubling down even as the price rises. This creates a lucrative scenario for perp DEX traders who can go long to collect the 29.87% annualised yield while riding the spot momentum. Checking these rates on a perp DEX aggregator like Tangerine is critical here; Hyperliquid might show deeper negative rates due to its degen user base compared to a more balanced order book on Bitget or KuCoin, offering varied entry points for funding rate arbitrage strategies.

GRIFFAIN & ZEREBRO: Moderate Long Premiums

Not all funding rates are at the extremes; some assets are showing moderate, sustainable premiums that indicate healthy bullish sentiment without the immediate threat of a violent unwinding. GRIFFAIN is currently offering a positive funding rate of 0.0260% per 8 hours, equating to a 28.47% annualised yield, with a mark price of $0.02. ZEREBRO follows a similar pattern at 0.0103% per 8 hours (11.32% annualised) and a mark price of $0.02. These rates suggest that longs are willing to pay a reasonable premium to maintain their positions, reflecting organic demand rather than a trapped leveraged cohort. For Web3 traders looking for a steadier carry trade, shorting these assets to collect the funding might be less risky than shorting MAVIA, but the lower yield requires significant capital to generate meaningful returns. When executing such strategies, the choice of venue matters immensely. A perp DEX like Lighter or Paradex might offer slightly different funding rates or lower trading fees compared to a giant like Bybit. Tangerine aggregates these venues, ensuring that traders don't leave money on the table. If GRIFFAIN is paying 28.47% on Hyperliquid but only 18% on OKX, the smart move is to route the short through the DEX to maximize the funding collected, effectively turning a moderate yield into an optimized crypto derivatives strategy.

Legacy Altcoins: AXS, PYTH & BABY Discount

The older guard of altcoins is reflecting a broader market fatigue, with funding rates skewing negative as capital migrates to newer narratives. AXS is printing a -0.0134% per 8 hours rate (-14.68% annualised) at a mark price of $1.10. PYTH, the oracle network, sits at -0.0108% per 8 hours (-11.8% annualised) with a mark of $0.05, and BABY is slightly negative at -0.0141% per 8 hours (-15.43% annualised) with a mark of $0.02. These are not the extreme shorts seen with BLAST or REZ; rather, they represent a structural lack of bullish conviction. The moderate negative rates indicate that traders are mildly bearish, unwilling to pay premiums for long exposure, but not aggressively shorting enough to trigger a squeeze. For those engaged in DeFi trading, these assets offer stable, low-volatility carry trade opportunities. Going long on AXS or PYTH to collect a 12-15% annualised yield, while simultaneously shorting a correlated asset or hedging with BTC perps, can generate consistent alpha. Cross-exchange arbitrage is also prevalent here; Hyperliquid might show a slightly deeper discount for AXS compared to Binance due to differing user demographics. By leveraging Tangerine to scan across multiple CEX and perp DEX order books, traders can identify the most favorable spread, ensuring their capital is deployed efficiently in the crypto derivatives market without taking on unwanted directional risk.

Cross-Exchange Funding Rate Arbitrage Strategies

The extreme fragmentation in today's ETH perpetual futures market is a goldmine for cross-exchange funding rate arbitrage. With assets like MAVIA paying 58.41% annualised on Hyperliquid but significantly less on centralized exchanges, and negative rates like BLAST's -46.0% varying wildly across venues, the spread between platforms is wide open. Arbitrageurs can exploit these gaps by taking opposing positions on different exchanges. For example, a trader could go long on BLAST on Binance, where the negative funding might be -30% annualised, and short BLAST on Hyperliquid to collect the full -46% (meaning they receive 46% as the short, pay 30% as the long, netting a risk-free 16% annualised spread, minus fees). This delta-neutral approach strips out market risk and isolates the funding rate differential. However, executing this manually requires constant monitoring and rapid capital deployment across multiple platforms. This is where a perp DEX aggregator like Tangerine becomes indispensable. By aggregating data from Hyperliquid, Aster, Vest, Bluefin, and major CEXs like Bybit and OKX, Tangerine provides a real-time dashboard of the best available rates. Traders can instantly spot where the arbitrage exists and execute their carry trade strategies efficiently. In a market where total cap is down 1.1% and directional bets are getting chopped up, relying on structural inefficiencies via funding rate arbitrage is the smartest play for sustainable Web3 yields.

Trade Ideas & The Path Forward

As we navigate the late-April crypto derivatives landscape, the data points to clear, actionable setups. The overarching theme is extreme polarization: you are either paying a massive premium for leveraged longs or getting paid handsomely to hold shorts against heavily crowded bearish bets. For aggressive yield seekers, the BLAST and REZ negative rates (-46.0% and -36.93% annualised respectively) offer compelling carry trade setups, provided you can manage the short squeeze risk inherent in zero-mark-price assets. A more conservative approach involves the moderate negative rates on legacy assets like AXS and PYTH, which provide steady income with lower volatility. For those looking at the long side, MAVIA’s 58.41% annualised rate is cooling off, but shorting it to collect the premium remains a high-risk, high-reward proposition. Always remember that funding rates are a thermometer of market sentiment; when they reach extremes, reversion to the mean is inevitable. We saw this yesterday, and as highlighted in the ETH Perp Funding Deep Dive, capitalizing on that reversion is where the alpha lies. Whether you are deploying capital on a perp DEX like WOOFi Pro or Hibachi, or sticking to the liquidity of Binance and KuCoin, ensuring you are on the right side of the rate is paramount. Use Tangerine to compare, execute, and optimize your ETH perp strategies, and turn market inefficiencies into consistent returns.

Start trading

Trade ETH perps on Tangerine

Compare ETH funding rates across all perp DEXs and trade at the best price.

Get Early Access →